{"id":549,"date":"2018-04-02T15:42:41","date_gmt":"2018-04-02T15:42:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/?p=549"},"modified":"2025-04-24T08:11:35","modified_gmt":"2025-04-24T12:11:35","slug":"a-morris-halle-memory","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/a-morris-halle-memory\/","title":{"rendered":"A Morris Halle memory"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu\/nll\/?p=37517#more-37517\">Morris Halle passed away earlier today<\/a>. Morris was an absolute giant in the field of linguistics.\u00a0His work in the 1950s and 1960s completely revolutionized phonological theory.\u00a0He did this, primarily, by rejecting an axiom of the previous century&#8217;s work. The theory of phonology was so utterly transformed by his argument against the principle of\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www2.let.uu.nl\/UiL-OTS\/Lexicon\/zoek.pl?lemma=Biuniqueness&amp;lemmacode=833\"><em>biuniqueness<\/em><\/a> that the very concept is rarely even taught in the 21st century. And this was just one of his earliest scientific contributions.<\/p>\n<p>I could say a lot more about Morris&#8217;s work, but instead let me tell a short anecdote.\u00a0In 2010 or so I happened to be in the Boston area and my advisor kindly arranged for me to meet Morris.\u00a0After getting coffee we walked to his spare shared office.\u00a0The only thing of note was a single wall-mounted bookshelf containing three books: Morris&#8217; own <em>Sound Pattern of Russian<\/em> and <em>Sound Pattern of English<\/em>\u2014with the dust cover removed so as to exhibit the unique bas-relief cover designed by Morris&#8217;s wife, a talented visual artist\u2014and of course, <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Walker%27s_Rhyming_Dictionary\">Walker&#8217;s rhyming dictionary<\/a>.\u00a0For whatever reason, we started to discuss Latin.\u00a0Working with the legal pad, Morris first showed me a novel analysis of thematic vowels.\u00a0Ignoring a few irregular (&#8220;athematic&#8221;) stems, all Latin verb stems have a characteristic final vowel:\u00a0<em>-\u0101-<\/em> in the first conjugation,\u00a0<em>-\u0113-<\/em> in the second,\u00a0a vowel of varying quality (usually <em>e<\/em> or <em>i<\/em>) in the third,\u00a0and <em>-\u012b-<\/em> in the fourth.\u00a0In the first conjugation and most of the third conjugation, this vowel disappears in the first person singular active indicative verb,\u00a0which is marked with an <em>-\u014d<\/em> suffix.\u00a0Thus for the second conjugation verb <em>doc\u0113re<\/em> &#8216;teach&#8217;,\u00a0we have <em>doce\u014d<\/em> &#8216;I teach&#8217;,\u00a0with the theme vowel preserved, and similarly for the fourth conjugation.\u00a0In contrast,\u00a0for the first conjugation verb <em>am\u0101re<\/em> &#8216;love&#8217;, we have <em>am\u014d<\/em> &#8216;I love&#8217;,\u00a0with the theme vowel omitted, and similarly for the majority of the third conjugation.\u00a0This much I already knew.\u00a0To me it was just one of those conjugational quirks one has to memorize when learning Latin but Morris suggested that it was not necessarily so.\u00a0What if, he argued, the first conjugation <em>-\u0101-<\/em> was deleted by a following <em>-\u014d<\/em>?\u00a0(Certainly that rule is surface-true, except for a handful of Greek loanwords like <em>chaos<\/em>.)\u00a0But what about the third conjugation?\u00a0Morris suggested that he had long believed the underlying form of the third conjugation theme vowel was [+back], something like \/\u0268\/, and he proceeded to lay out the necessary allophonic rules, and finally a rule which deletes the first of two [+back] segments!\u00a0I was floored.<\/p>\n<p>I then showed him an analysis I was working on at the time.\u00a0Once again ignoring a few irregulars, Latin masculines and feminine nouns of the third declension are characterized by a nominative singular suffix <em>-s<\/em>.\u00a0When the verb stem is athematic and ends in a \/t, d\/, this consonant is deleted in the nominative singular (e.g., <em>frons<\/em>, <em>frontis<\/em> &#8216;forehead&#8217;).\u00a0I argued that this rule ought to be extended to also target \/r\/ so as to account for the so-called &#8220;rhotic&#8221; stems like <em>hon\u014ds<\/em>, <em>hon\u014dris<\/em> &#8216;honor&#8217; (e.g., \/hon\u014dr-s\/ \u2192 [hon\u014ds]).\u00a0To make this work, one must write the rule so that it bleeds its own application (see <a href=\"http:\/\/wellformedness.com\/papers\/gorman-2012.pdf\">here<\/a> for the full analysis), and as one of several opaque rules. This is something which is possible in the rule-application framework proposed by Morris and colleagues, but which cannot be straightforwardly implemented in more recent theoretical frameworks.\u00a0I must have hesitated for a moment as I was talking through this, because Morris grabbed my hand and said to me: &#8220;Young man, remember always to speak clearly and to never apologize for your rule ordering.&#8221; And then he bid me adieu.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Morris Halle passed away earlier today. Morris was an absolute giant in the field of linguistics.\u00a0His work in the 1950s and 1960s completely revolutionized phonological theory.\u00a0He did this, primarily, by rejecting an axiom of the previous century&#8217;s work. The theory of phonology was so utterly transformed by his argument against the principle of\u00a0biuniqueness that the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/a-morris-halle-memory\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;A Morris Halle memory&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"aside","meta":{"_crdt_document":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4,6,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-549","post","type-post","status-publish","format-aside","hentry","category-language","category-phonology","category-presentation-of-self","post_format-post-format-aside"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/549","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=549"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/549\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2356,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/549\/revisions\/2356"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}