{"id":2487,"date":"2026-03-18T10:27:25","date_gmt":"2026-03-18T14:27:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/?p=2487"},"modified":"2026-03-27T12:27:26","modified_gmt":"2026-03-27T16:27:26","slug":"callout-post-peer-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/callout-post-peer-review\/","title":{"rendered":"A callout post"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A few years ago I wrote to an eminent phonologist noting a small omission in a publicly circulated manuscript of theirs marked &#8220;to appear in [major journal]&#8221;. They took the suggestion politely. In a follow-up, I asked when the manuscript would appear in [major journal]. They\u2014the eminent phonologist, who I am keeping gender-neutral purely for anonymity\u2014said they had no idea: the paper had been accepted to said major journal with minimal revisions years and years earlier, but they&#8217;d never bothered to send in the final version of the manuscript to the editors.<\/p>\n<p>I realize it&#8217;s easy to let work, even good work, gather a bit of dusk. I&#8217;m guilty of this myself at times and I imagine it happens even more when one is eminent. But what this essay supposes is that <strong>it is bad for work, particularly by eminent linguists, to sit in public view without peer review<\/strong>, for years or even indefinitely.<\/p>\n<p>Let me provide an example. I am working on a revision of a squib in which I provide a simple analysis of [phenomenon]. My motivation for interest in [phenomenon] is more or less that I saw a talk, a few years ago, presenting an alternative analysis for [phenomenon] using [bizarre theory]. While I am not ready to say that [bizarre theory] is &#8220;completely mad&#8221; (as one of my less-eminent colleagues has it), it was promulgated in a manuscript by an eminent phonologist (a different one this time) and that eminent phonologist&#8217;s eminent former student. That manuscript has, by now, circulated for a decade without any sort of peer review, but it has racked up hundreds of citations, and while certainly interesting, it raises many, many more questions about [bizarre theory] than it answers. This is a roundabout way to say, then, that [bizarre theory] has at its foundation a paper that would not make it through double-blind peer review in its current sketchy form. That&#8217;s not to say that a full explication of [bizarre theory] wouldn&#8217;t make it into print, but I suspect a peer-reviewed version would be much more valuable for the field than the decade-old manuscript we actually have.<\/p>\n<p>So to be clear: I think these eminent linguists should just polish up these manuscripts and send them off for peer review. I for one have never had a paper which wasn&#8217;t substantially improved by peer review. And in particular, I think it&#8217;s borderline unethical for these eminent linguists to treat unpublished manuscripts as good enough for their graduate students to base a dissertation on, for instance, if they&#8217;re unwilling to even debate the work with their peers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A few years ago I wrote to an eminent phonologist noting a small omission in a publicly circulated manuscript of theirs marked &#8220;to appear in [major journal]&#8221;. They took the suggestion politely. In a follow-up, I asked when the manuscript would appear in [major journal]. They\u2014the eminent phonologist, who I am keeping gender-neutral purely for &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/callout-post-peer-review\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;A callout post&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crdt_document":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4,6,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2487","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-language","category-phonology","category-presentation-of-self"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2487","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2487"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2487\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2499,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2487\/revisions\/2499"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2487"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2487"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2487"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}