{"id":1068,"date":"2021-10-24T19:28:47","date_gmt":"2021-10-24T19:28:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/?p=1068"},"modified":"2021-12-04T13:13:52","modified_gmt":"2021-12-04T13:13:52","slug":"linguistics-sokal-affair","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/linguistics-sokal-affair\/","title":{"rendered":"Linguistics has its own Sokal affair"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sokal_affair\"><em>Sokal affair<\/em><\/a> was a minor incident in which physics professor Alan Sokal published a &#8220;hoax&#8221; (his term) paper in the cultural studies journal\u00a0<em>Social Text<\/em>. Sokal&#8217;s intent was to demonstrate that reviewers and editors would approve of an article of utter nonsense so long as it obeyed certain preconceived notions, in this case that everything is a social construct. (It is, but that&#8217;s a story for another blog.)<\/p>\n<p>The affair has been &#8220;read&#8221; many ways but it is generally understood to illustrate poor editorial standards at top humanities journals and\/or the bankruptcy of the entire cultural studies enterprise. However, I don&#8217;t think we have any reason to suspect that either of these critiques are limited to cultural studies and adjacent fields.<\/p>\n<p>I submit that the Pirah\u00e3 recursion affair has many of the makings of a linguistic Sokal affair. But if anything, the outlook for linguistics is quite a bit worse than the Sokal story. By all accounts, Sokal&#8217;s hoax article was a minor scholarly event, and does not seem to have received much attention before it was revealed to be a hoax. In contrast, when Everett&#8217;s article first appeared in\u00a0<em>Current Anthropology\u00a0<\/em>in 2005, it received an enormous amount of attention from both scholars and the press, and ultimately led to to multiple books, including a sympathetic portrait of Everett and his work by none other than the late Tom Wolfe (bang! krrp!). Finally, nearly all of what Everett has written on the subject is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/i-read-language-the-cultural-tool-youll-never-guess-what-happened-next\/\">manifest nonsense<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>I believe many scholars in linguistics and adjacent fields found Everett&#8217;s claim compelling, and while I think linguists should have seen through the logical leaps and magical thinking in the <em>Current Anthropology<\/em> piece, it wasn&#8217;t until a few years later, after the exchange with Nevins et al. in <em>Language<\/em>, that the empirical issues (to put it mildly) with Everett&#8217;s claims came to light. But the key element which gave Everett&#8217;s work such influence is that, like Sokal intended his hoax to do, it played to the biases (anti-generativist, and particularly, anti-Noam Chomsky) of a wide swath of academics (and to a lesser degree, fans of US empire, like Tom Wolfe). In that regard, it scarcely matters whether Everett himself believes or believed what he wrote: we have all been hoaxed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The\u00a0Sokal affair was a minor incident in which physics professor Alan Sokal published a &#8220;hoax&#8221; (his term) paper in the cultural studies journal\u00a0Social Text. Sokal&#8217;s intent was to demonstrate that reviewers and editors would approve of an article of utter nonsense so long as it obeyed certain preconceived notions, in this case that everything is &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/linguistics-sokal-affair\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Linguistics has its own Sokal affair&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crdt_document":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1068","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-language","category-presentation-of-self"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1068","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1068"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1068\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1116,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1068\/revisions\/1116"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1068"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1068"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wellformedness.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1068"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}